Reports

This report investigates the BEE policy preferences of registered black South African voters. It does so via three different questions about civil service appointment, public procurement and private business operation. The questions were posed in terms of a 'future coalition' in April of 2024. The Foundation would suggest that these preferences can now be translated into policy preferences for the current coalition government (Government of National Unity) that governs South Africa. The data in the report is drawn from a survey of 1 835 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted in April 2024. That survey had a margin of error of 6% for black South Africans.

This report investigates the policy preferences of registered South African voters on taxes and federalism. It does so via two questions on whether the government should increase or decrease taxes and whether the government should strengthen the role of the provinces and municipalities in the provision of services. The questions were posed in terms of a 'future coalition' in April of 2024. The Foundation would suggest that these preferences can now be translated into policy preferences for the current coalition government (Government of National Unity) that governs South Africa. The data in the report is drawn from a survey of 1 835 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted in April 2024. That survey had a margin of error of 4%.

This report investigates the policy preferences of registered South African voters on the nationalisation of various industries. It does so via three questions on the nationalisation of pension funds, healthcare and education. The questions were posed in terms of a 'future coalition' in April of 2024. The Foundation would suggest that these preferences can now be translated into policy preferences for the current coalition government (Government of National Unity) that governs South Africa. The data in the report is drawn from a survey of 1 835 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted in April 2024. That survey had a margin of error of 4%.

This report investigates the BEE policy preferences of registered South African voters. It does so via two different questions about whether South Africa should align with the West or Russia, China and Saudi Arabia and whether South Africa should create foreign policy based on economic benefit to the country or on shared ideologies. The questions were posed in terms of a 'future coalition' in April of 2024. The Foundation would suggest that these preferences can now be translated into policy preferences for the current coalition government (Government of National Unity) that governs South Africa. The data in the report is drawn from a survey of 1 835 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted in April 2024. That survey had a margin of error of 4%.

This report investigates the BEE policy preferences of registered South African voters. It does so via three different questions about civil service appointment, public procurement and private business operation. The questions were posed in terms of a 'future coalition' in April of 2024. The Foundation would suggest that these preferences can now be translated into policy preferences for the current coalition government (Government of National Unity) that governs South Africa. The data in the report is drawn from a survey of 1 835 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted in April 2024. That survey had a margin of error of 4%.

This report is the third in a series tracking the political race in America ahead of that country's November 2024 presidential election. The data is drawn from a wide cross-section of polling organisations. This report produces three tables employing three different methodologies. The first methodology was to award states that polled generally in favour of either candidate to that candidate. The second was to award states that polled within the margins of error to Mr Trump. The third was to award states that polled within the margins of error to Ms Harris.

This report investigates political party support in South Africa across different residential area types. It does so via two different charts. The first chart measures what share of people in a particular residential area type vote for a particular political party. The second chart measures what share of the support of a particular political party comes from a particular residential area type. The data in the report is drawn from a survey of 7 196 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted in April and May 2024. That survey had a margin of error of 2%.

This report investigates political party support in South Africa across different racial groups. It does so via two different charts. The first chart measures what share of people in a particular racial group vote for a particular political party. The second chart measures what share of the support of a particular political party comes from a particular racial group. The data in the report is drawn from a survey of 7 196 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted in April and May 2024. That survey had a margin of error of 2%.

This report investigates political party support in South Africa across different monthly income brackets. It does so via two different charts. The first chart measures what share of people in a monthly income bracket vote for a particular political party. The second chart measures what share of the support of a particular political party comes from a particular monthly income bracket. The data in the report is drawn from a survey of 7 196 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted in April and May 2024. That survey had a margin of error of 2%.