Perceptions Of South African Voters On Whether The United States Would Be Justified In Introducing Targeted Sanctions Against South African Leaders
This report explores the perception amongst registered voters on whether the United States would be justified in introducing targeted sanctions against corrupt leaders and individuals who work against the national security interests of the United States. The data in the report comes from a survey of 1 004 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted by the Foundation during February of 2025. That survey had a margin of error of 4%. Totals may not add up to 100% where respondents refused to answer a question.
The American government would be justified in introducing targeted sanctions against corrupt leaders in South Africa and against any individuals in South Africa who work against the interest of the United States.
By race
The American government would be justified in introducing targeted sanctions against corrupt leaders in South Africa and against any individuals in South Africa who work against the interest of the United States.
By education
The American government would be justified in introducing targeted sanctions against corrupt leaders in South Africa and against any individuals in South Africa who work against the interest of the United States.
By income
The American government would be justified in introducing targeted sanctions against corrupt leaders in South Africa and against any individuals in South Africa who work against the interest of the United States.
By party affiliation
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS
The data indicates that registered voters were split essentially 50/50 on support for targeted sanctions against South African political leaders.