GNU Policy Preferences - Race-Based Appointment and Procurement Policies
This report investigates post-GNU policy preferences towards race-based government appointments and procurement. The data in the report comes from a survey of 1 204 demographically and geographically representative registered voters conducted by the Foundation during September of 2024. That survey had a margin of error of 3%.
'The GNU makes race-based appointment rules in the civil service stricter' OR 'The GNU gets rid of race-based appointments in the civil service so that all appointments are based only on merit.'
By race
'The GNU makes race-based appointment rules in the civil service stricter' OR 'The GNU gets rid of race-based appointments in the civil service so that all appointments are based only on merit.'
By education
'The GNU makes race-based appointment rules in the civil service stricter' OR 'The GNU gets rid of race-based appointments in the civil service so that all appointments are based only on merit.'
By party affiliation
'The GNU makes race-based procurement rules for tenders stricter.' OR 'The GNU gets rid of race-based procurement so that procurement is based only on the effectiveness of the bid.'
By race
'The GNU makes race-based procurement rules for tenders stricter.' OR 'The GNU gets rid of race-based procurement so that procurement is based only on the effectiveness of the bid.'
By education
'The GNU makes race-based procurement rules for tenders stricter.' OR 'The GNU gets rid of race-based procurement so that procurement is based only on the effectiveness of the bid.'
By party affiliation
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS
The data indicates that strong majorities of voters across lines of race, education and party affiliation wish for race-based appointment and procurement policies to be replaced by policies that prioritise merit. This is in line with previous Foundation surveys that have found strong support for appointments and procurement based on merit.